Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Moon Can Blow Me
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per A3 by It Is Me Here. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 15:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Moon Can Blow Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Potential hoax. I'm no expert on show tunes, but I'm highly skeptical. Also, no luck on initial 8 pages of g-hits on The Moon Can Blow Me by Astaire or Shatner. No hits at all on That Was No Lady, by either Gershwin. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As possible hoax, and definetely as non-notable (hell, the text disclaims notability!). Please see here for possible origin. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 05:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I doubt the term blow me existed in the 1920's. Nate • (chatter) 07:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- not to mention the shudder factor of William Shatner singing those lyrics... --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 08:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. "Lost forever" kinda tipped me off. Well, at least it sounds plausible that Shatner would sing (talk?) a song like this... Graymornings(talk) 08:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, as originally proposed, after the originator described it as a test page and disclaimed notability. Subsequent addition of nonsense did not alter its status. JNW (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - seems made-up because even the phrase "blow me" I think it fairly modern and was not used in the 1920s. Also the text itself proves it is non-notable if it is genuine. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete G3 as blatant misinformation. So tagged. In the alternative, delete as nonnotable. HeureusementIci (talk) 05:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.